Group compatibility
You can check compatibility between members starting with two people. With three or more, we'll also show the group average.
Explore our group chemistry
Before entering someone else's type code, make sure that person has agreed to have their result included in this group reading. Inputs are computed only in your browser and are never stored on our servers.
Example codes · tap to try one
You can start with two people. Please enter at least two type codes.
Self-exploration aid. Not a basis for hiring, relationship, financial, or medical decisions.
How the group scores are worked out
Every pair gets its own score
Enter the type codes of the people in your group and every possible pair is compared across the five personality traits, giving a score from 0 to 100. Three people make three pairs, four make six, five make ten.
Cohesion is the average of all those pair scores. If one or two pairs are unusually low but the rest are evenly high, cohesion still comes out high, so reading which pair has which score tells you more than the single number.
Three kinds of link
Pairs with code-based scores of 75 or more are shown as synergy links, 60 to 74 as comparison links, and below 60 as observation links. These names identify score bands.
The score alone cannot tell you whether an actual relationship is good or bad. Use it as a conversation reference while checking what you will actually do together and each person's experience.
Connectors and observers
The connector ranking orders the sum of scores between each person's type code and everyone else's code. A higher total means a higher sum of code-based scores; it does not mean the person actually brings the group together well.
Observer candidates have an average score with others of at least 60 but below 65, with no pair scoring 75 or more. This condition alone cannot tell you their actual role or behavior. Ask directly for their views to check whether any perspective has not yet been heard.
Look at the pairs behind the average
After reading the example average, trace which pair scores make up each connector total. Similar totals can hide different connections: one person's scores may be even across many people, while another's high scores cluster around a few. Put the scores with each person beside the total to see differences the ranking alone cannot show.
If a pair scores low, first check what they will actually do together. The questions differ depending on whether they discuss things often or handle separate tasks with little contact. For a pair that regularly works together, ask when checking each other's views felt uncomfortable. If they have little contact, avoid forcing an explanation of their relationship; just note a question for their next shared task. Read the map according to actual contact, rather than turning totals into personal responsibilities.
Example group connections and average SLOAI The Caring ConnectorRCOAN The Steady Builder
70 · Comparison link · 60-74
SLOAI The Caring ConnectorSCUAI The Easygoing Mixer
78 · Synergy link · 75 or higher
SLOAI The Caring ConnectorRLUEN Independent Explorer
63 · Comparison link · 60-74
RCOAN The Steady BuilderSCUAI The Easygoing Mixer
74 · Comparison link · 60-74
RCOAN The Steady BuilderRLUEN Independent Explorer
67 · Comparison link · 60-74
SCUAI The Easygoing MixerRLUEN Independent Explorer
59 · Observation link · below 60
Cohesion 69
Connector ranking
- SLOAI The Caring Connector · 211 total
- RCOAN The Steady Builder · 211 total
- SCUAI The Easygoing Mixer · 211 total
- RLUEN Independent Explorer · 189 total
Each pair's share shrinks as the group grows
When someone joins, they form a new pair with each existing member. Pair counts grow faster than headcounts, so each pair's score makes up a smaller share of the overall average. A pair that stood out in a small group may be hidden among many others in a larger group. Remember that the overall average can change even when the same pair's score stays unchanged.
When comparing before and after a membership change, distinguish connections among the people who remain from new connections. Reading a change in the average as a change in the existing members' relationships confuses the two. Also look separately at the scores added to connector totals by new partners. Rather than directly comparing totals for groups with different members, look at where scores concentrate within the same group to distinguish membership changes from patterns of connection.
Find where to ask questions on the map
When asking for the group's views, describe the actual task and ask how each person prefers to proceed, rather than calling them by a result label. Giving everyone the same question, such as 'What would you like to settle before preparing?', makes answers easier to compare. Give anyone who finds it hard to answer immediately time to think, and leave a chance to add something after hearing others.
Pairs with a shared task can each state their preferred pace and when to check in. If their answers differ, agree separately on what to confirm before starting and what to ask again along the way. Do not leave every decision to the person gathering opinions; check together that no answer needed for the decision is missing. Afterwards, have everyone say what felt comfortable about the agreed approach and what they would change. When assigning roles next time, consider both that feedback and what each person can actually take on.
Please keep in mind
Scores are calculated only from combinations of personality traits. Real relationships change a great deal with time spent together and conversation. Please don't use this to decide who doesn't get along with whom; use it as material for talking about how to shape your next get-together.